ASP.NET Core Testing with XUnit and MoQ
by Rob Richardson
About Me
Rob Richardson is a software craftsman building web properties in ASP.NET and Node, Angular and React. He's a frequent speaker at conferences, user groups, and community events, and a diligent teacher and student of high quality software development. You can find this and other talks on https://robrich.org/presentations and follow him on twitter at @rob_rich.
.NET Core
.NET Core Features
- Single compile works cross platform
- Open source
- Lighter weight
- Remove legacy baggage
- Small NuGet packages
- Command-line tools
- bin-deployable framework
- Dependency Injection is baked in
.NET Core: didn't make the cut
- In-memory compiling
- project.json
- Write project file yourself
- Remove web.config
All these were or will soon be reversed
.NET Standard
.NET Classic
Source: http://andrewlock.net/understanding-net-core-netstandard-and-asp-net-core/
Portable Class Libraries
Source: http://andrewlock.net/understanding-net-core-netstandard-and-asp-net-core/
Portable Class Libraries
Each runtime is a fork
I must pre-select the runtimes I want
New runtime? I must recompile
.NET Standard
Source: http://andrewlock.net/understanding-net-core-netstandard-and-asp-net-core/
.NET Standard
| Target Platform Name | Alias | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .NET Platform Standard | netstandard | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| .NET Core | netcoreapp | → | → | → | → | → | 1.0 |
| .NET Framework | net | → | → | → | → | → | 4.6.2 |
| → | → | → | → | 4.6.1 | |||
| → | → | → | 4.6 | ||||
| → | → | 4.5.2 | |||||
| → | → | 4.5.1 | |||||
| → | 4.5 | ||||||
| Universal Windows Platform | uap | → | → | → | → | 10.0 | |
| Windows | win | → | → | 8.1 | |||
| → | 8.0 | ||||||
| Windows Phone | wpa | → | → | 8.1 | |||
| Windows Phone Silverlight | wp | 8.1 | |||||
| 8.0 | |||||||
| Mono/Xamarin Platforms | → | → | → | → | → | * | |
| Mono | → | → | * |
Source: http://andrewlock.net/understanding-net-core-netstandard-and-asp-net-core/
.NET Standard
An evolution of PCL
Identifies a common feature set
for this version of .NET
in all environments
Detail: http://andrewlock.net/understanding-net-core-netstandard-and-asp-net-core/
Analogy (pseudocode): https://gist.github.com/davidfowl/8939f305567e1755412d6dc0b8baf1b7
ASP.NET Core
Port of MVC onto .NET Core
All the features you know and love
- Controllers
- Razor
- Action filters
- Web API
New ASP.NET Features
- Built on OWIN
- Self-hosted
or reverse-proxied from IIS - Web API rolled in
- Tag Helpers
- Bower and NPM
New features from .NET Core:
- Cross-platform
- Nano server
- Fast startup
- bin deployable framework
Not ported
- Web Forms
- SignalR (coming soon)
- GDI+ (System.Drawing)
- Control libraries?
- Other dependencies?
New Entity Framework Features
- Much better defaults
- Supports much more databases
- Entity Framework Migrations
- ... including non-relational data stores
- No edmx, no designer
Or bring your own data story through NuGet
Can I move to .NET Core?
- Do I need cross-platform or nano server?
- Are all my dependencies ported?
- Am I ok with the pace of bleeding edge?
- Do I want to go fast?
Dependency checker: icanhasdot.net
ASP.NET Core Demo
Testing
Testing pieces
- Test harness:
the thing that kicks it off - Test framework:
the library for structuring tests - Assertion library:
validating things, throw on fail - Mocking framework:
swap out irrelevant things
Testing pieces
- Test harness:
TestDriven.NET or Resharper test runner - Test framework:
NUnit or XUnit.net - Assertion library:
built-in or Fluent Assertions or Shouldly - Mocking framework:
Rhino Mocks or MoQ
XUnit
- First one ported to .NET Core
- Used by ASP.NET team to test ASP.NET Core
MoQ
- ASP.NET team built it to test MVC
- Doesn't have magic strings (easier to refactor)
- Arrange / Act / Assert style
rather than record / playback
FluentAssertions
- Not necessary, but makes it read much, much better
- It just throws exceptions on fails
- Code reads like a sentence
- Failure message reads like a sentence